welp,some people have said to me how rough and bad this mk-1200 is,but after i,myself rode it,well,it wasnt that bad.sure,headbanging,there were some,...
welp,some people have said to me how rough and bad this mk-1200 is,but after i,myself rode it,well,it wasnt that bad.sure,headbanging,there were some,but i love the european mk-1200 more than the american ones,super manage,foe example,was so bad,so headbanger of a ride,and so not fun,crockscrew,the defunctpne playland coaster,was also pretty bad,this one however,is one if the better ones in the line.the ride was opened in 1981 under the name super tornado,which was renamed in 2007 to flying tigers.it is the first of the mk-1200 whirlwind coasters ever created,which today,6 are operational world wide.whirlwinds are a simple model,including a compact layout and two crockscrew usually.so lets go and give this a shout,altough its a cloned layout,its still the first of its layout type,so ill pass with it.well,the ride is fun,the layout is retty cool,some good turns,and alough no airtimes,the ride is still gives a great,fun inversions which are fun to go through,the location was alos nice,setted in a forest like area,which with the name,helps me to feel like im on a tiger,flying through the forest.but welp,the ride is a headbanger,and thats ruined its potential to be a good vekoma,the ostrs doesnt help to that fact since they are making the ride much more uncomfortable.i wish they will give it the same treatmant as speedsnake at fort fun,sunkid trains will improve the ride for me,but pass headbanging,which,theyre coming rarely,it was still a fun ride,and highly reccomand it to must german people out there.
welp guys,what do i rhink?it is a bad spinning mouse,and reverchon needs to know how bad this is,i expected it from zamperla to buld such a dead spinn...
welp guys,what do i rhink?it is a bad spinning mouse,and reverchon needs to know how bad this is,i expected it from zamperla to buld such a dead spinner,but i guess reverchon did it.alright,this coaster was build in 1998,making it the second coaster in the park,but its still bad.its smooth of course,no headbanging,or that.but it was weak,the switchbacks were weak compared to a real wild mouse,but not only that,ts barely spun,yes,the ride supposed to be spinning,but the entire ride,we just didnt get spinning,its supposed to spin,but airtime was good,but also slow and really floatery insteadf of ejectory.
this is another ride at the park that got ruined so badly by its roughness,which is a shame,it could be a much better ride,but destroyed by some rough...
this is another ride at the park that got ruined so badly by its roughness,which is a shame,it could be a much better ride,but destroyed by some rough transitions and low intensity.but ill go on ranting later.lets see where the ride came from.the ride was build in 2004 by the japanese company,senyo kogyo co...ltd.if you dont know,this is a japanese company which was established in 1958 and had made chinese coasters over the years,thier last coaster was build in 2016 and it is a shame,i really wanted to see the company imroving more over the years as i saw them on their opening time,this one however,deserve more work.but lets see what is good about it.well,if were speaking on the layout of the coaster,its a mine train,yes,it isnt technically a mine train,but the layout is a wide spreaded,and scenic one,which gives it the title of a mine train coaster.but it was a fun layout,for some reason,its reminds me of the mine train at fiesta texas,road runner express.maybe since its a high,mine trained coaster,but its a cool layout,providing some good floater air for some reason,cool head choppers effects and even good views,omg,those views,its swoops around parts of the park and gives such scenic views,it is fun to look at.the intensity might be sinceits,in my opinion,a heavily relide on views,which i can forgive,but i cant forgive is its roughness,it is such a rough coaster and in the amazingness of the views,comes this really hard headbanging in turns which is so damn awful,its rattely and bouncy and they really,should retarck it since the ride can have its own potential,but got ruined later by roughness,so yes,its fine,i just wish it was way smoother than it is,but hey,rowdy was worse,so i give it a pass.
this ride isnt good,its one of the worst family coasters out there.its kinda reminds me of a worst version of a miny mine train.but credit,this is the...
this ride isnt good,its one of the worst family coasters out there.its kinda reminds me of a worst version of a miny mine train.but credit,this is their first coaster for the park,opening all the way back in 1982 and build by 2 companies,okamoto co.ltd and meisho amusment machines.but its still bad ride for families.firstly,why is it so rough with this dull layout?yes,problem i have with those japanese companys is that they are just sticking to the wall whatever they want on the wall,altough it can be fun,meisho and okamoto didnt succeeded on this family little coaster.firstly.the turns and the ride were so slow,even for a family coaster stadarts,yes,it was dull ride,with maybe some cool moments of airtime,but thats it,and unlike elf,another coaster at this park,it was still less and focused on turns more,that way the ride just became so dull and the airtime isnt that good either.but omg,this ride is also rough as hell,every turn bands you to the restrains despite its low speed which is really,not good.so yes,im reccomanding skipping it and ride elf instead,its a much better coaster unlike this trash.im really want form them to retrack the ride,they wont remove it beacuse the good historic value,but if you want to do a good family coaster,make it smooth to ride.
welp,this might not be my top 10 coaster any time soon,but unironically,it was still a decent ride,not bad,but not good either.that is actually the la...
welp,this might not be my top 10 coaster any time soon,but unironically,it was still a decent ride,not bad,but not good either.that is actually the last of the intamin regular woodies(not the refabricadet ones).and this was back in the day when the swiss company still looked for identity,this one was build in 2001 and it is,as said,decent,its much better than must of their original woodies before elf.so ill get going nd give my honest opinions.welp,i kinda mixed about the layout,for one they have the original wooden turns,which yes are pretty weak,but airtime hills,they were actually pretty strong here,it is kinda cool to get some good airtimes,and airtimes on woodies,are much better than airtime on those steel coaster,since,i dont know,its quit a unique air that i cant describe.but yes,the turns werent that good and only waited for some airtime to come.it is a fun ride honestly,i can see this with the not so intense layout as the first woodie kids might go on.but,the ride isnt that smooth with many rattely sections,yes,those older woodies didnt age well over the years,and even the last of those didnt survive the agind process,but if you taking the dead turns and rattle,the ride is like a fun family wooden,not gravity kraft levels,but still fun and intresting coaster to the park
Steel Dolphin is a very exciting ride! Imo, the force calculations are really clever and are just perfect for the target audience of the ride.
Seve...
Steel Dolphin is a very exciting ride! Imo, the force calculations are really clever and are just perfect for the target audience of the ride.
Several solid moments of airtime, along with great twisty elements provide the bulk of a diverse experience. Although some parts are less forceful, the ride as a whole is remarkably dynamic! The impressive location is a nice bonus too.
this ride,was great ride and a good to the crappy chinese knock offs collection of the park.well,as i notices,its later clone,hyper coaster is got muc...
this ride,was great ride and a good to the crappy chinese knock offs collection of the park.well,as i notices,its later clone,hyper coaster is got much attention than flash,the original mack hyper.its a shame,yes,i didnt have problems with the trukish hyper coaster,i feel like most of you,entusiaste,forgetting the prototype which started it all,and it is a great ride and surley must be talked in a full in depth review.so here we go on the prototype for mack.the rides layout was perfectly designed,not only it is known for the biggest loop on a coaster,but there is some elements that worth mentioning on the ride.the twisty first drop was so snappy and pushed me over to my sit.those airtime hills were so fun,altough some were pretty dead,they still gave some good ride for me.and the hangtime on those two inversions,was perfect and gave a sencition of hanging.iit was a perfect layout,some airtime hills were twisty in their build,making the ride much more thrilling,and also those turns were perfectly designed to thrill.the ride is of course,comfortable,the lapbars were good and of course were desinges perfectly.but some rattle can be felt,during some parts.but thats ok,its a prototype,it doesnt have to be smooth,and acctually hyper coaster have the same rattle.but entusaiste,dont forget this ride,and go ride it,you wont be dissapointed with it.
World's tallest, fastest Wing B&M delivers a two-part experience : while the first part is very aerial, the second one happens around the rock that co...
World's tallest, fastest Wing B&M delivers a two-part experience : while the first part is very aerial, the second one happens around the rock that constitutes the central theming element of the park. Location is wonderful and passages around the rock deliver some serious head/footchoppers. The coaster is more about intensity than airtime, with a constant grey/blackout after the banked over turn. Last inversion is absolutely fantastic!
Two downsides: the damned harnesses and one or two rattles, especially on the overbooked turn. Not the masterpiece we could hope for but still my favorite WIngcoaster by now.
this ride is a good one,it is an arrow looper which have a nice history to it.originally,it was in a defunct park in rhode island under the name loop ...
this ride is a good one,it is an arrow looper which have a nice history to it.originally,it was in a defunct park in rhode island under the name loop crokscrew and was originaly build in 1984.but then brought to wild waves in 1995,and guess what,its a good historic coaster,but rcdb says that it was opened on the same year as kiddy coaster.but lets just get to the review,the pace was kept with the good layout,it was fun,compact and well,actually i liked the inversions alot,the loop was fun and fairly smooth and the crokscrews were with a good bits of hangtime,i belive it is a good coaster but sadly,this is an old arrow,and as we know,arrow loopers arent the smoothest,its a shame,sins it would had potential,and i belive they could get a new trains,but it didnt bothered me,well a little bit,but i at this point knew it will be rouh,and didnt mind.overall,it is a fun and historic coaster,and you can ride it if you are an arrow fan.
guys,klondike is a pretty bad wild mouse,it one of the worst wild mouses that build and im even dont reccomand this one.welp,the layout isnt helping,i...
guys,klondike is a pretty bad wild mouse,it one of the worst wild mouses that build and im even dont reccomand this one.welp,the layout isnt helping,its your standart,boring layout of a wild mouse,but still,even with the fact that the layout is unoriginall,it is still bad.switchbacks were weak af,as a wild mouse goes,those swithc backs needs to be good,but here they are just forceless and doesnt provides any banking at all.the other half is just hurting to you,and since this is a wild mouse,a coaster that build to this banked and need to be done smoothly,is a really bad thing.and the only positive i can say about it is that the airtime was pretty decent,not the best,but ok for my standarts.im reccomanding to skip this one if you are only for credits.
