• Ashlin Orrell

    Fluidité Théma Sans intérêt

    What even was this ride? Just terrible. Could see the track... seeing the station as you go vaguely nearby is not a good look. The video sections are terrible. Like some bad projector screen. Story was incomprehensible to a non-spanish speaker. Gave it 1 star as the other people in the carriage seemed to like it.

  • Sarah W.

    Airtimes Confort Fun Fiabilité

    This ride is never open but when it is its a ton of fun. In my opinion its one of the more comfortable rides at the park but that's not saying much.

  • Sarah W.

    Vibrations Inconfort Lap Bar

    They just did some updating to those ride and is now called the "Twister III" I thought this meant they would fix some of its bigger flaws like how old the wood is and how much it throws you around. After one ride today I and my partner were sick. I could hear other people on the ride complaining just as much. The wood is broken in many places and feels very unsafe. I used to love this coaster but until they update it I don't think I'd feel safe riding again.

  • Rodrigo Peralta

    First Drop Débit Longueur

    Una montaña rusa imprescindible si vas al parque, tiene momentos con muy buen airtime

  • Rodrigo Peralta

    Inversions Chef d'oeuvre Intensité Trop court

    Es una obra maestra en todos los sentidos, la mejor montaña rusa que he probado nunca

  • John Doe

    Théma Débit Vibrations Inconfort Lap Bar

    Rode 2 times, first row and last row, didn't make much of a difference imho. It's relatively intense for being a family coaster, but also randomly slows to a crawl on various spots. But it sadly has lots of shaking, a bad shared lap bar and lots of discomfort due to the awful restraint/seat/everything. And I just felt bad and a bit dizzy after the ride, which does not happen at all for me with other rides (e.g. Taron). I wish I hadn't ridden it at all. And it's also a very, very long ride, which would normally be great, but in this case I wished both times that it would be over already. I loved the rest of Phantasialand, this was the only bad part for me.

  • Glass Cannonn

    Situation Layout Vibrations Déception ! Inconfort

    This has to be better when I rode it 10 years ago. I think I had it rated at least a 3.5 or 4. It’s just super rough now. Not surprising for an aging arrow coaster that has some badly profiled parts of track. Great layout for a mine train but just to rough for me to want to ride ever again

  • Glass Cannonn

    Longueur Inconfort

    I’m always puzzled at how uncomfortably made most kiddie coasters are. Seems like that should be priority #1 for a coaster for children. It’s horribly uncomfortable for people of any age and size.

  • Glass Cannonn

    First Drop Bonne suprise ! Situation Trop court

    Was surprised how much I enjoyed this one. Some great airtime in the back row, really smooth for its age and the inversion were the Goldilocks of inversions. Not too aggressive not to dull nicely contoured and enjoyable. Wish it was longer but a fantastic supporting ride to king and queen of the park OR and TT. Didn’t get a chance to ride front row, but based on the airtime we got in the back row I’m guessing that’s the best place to ride.

  • Glass Cannonn

    Airtimes Launch Fun

    I really have a soft spot for unique coasters as long as they are fun and at least mostly comfortable and this checks off both boxes. It just got knocked out of my top 35 list but could even find its way back on if I re ride others that disappoint. Fun launch, airtime could stand being a bit longer but definitely a good one.